COMMENT ⊗   VALID 00003 PAGES
C REC  PAGE   DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002	blacklist of university where students and professors have prevented
C00005 00003
C00008 ENDMK
C⊗;
blacklist of university where students and professors have prevented
speakers from lecturing and other bad guys

Melbourne University
14 September 1977: source New Scientist 13 October 1977
Eysenck

Don Widener - TV producer who got libel judgment when PG and E engineer
criticized his misquoting him

Martin Lewis - British journalist who exposed Afghani athlete who
told him he wanted to defect at the Moscow Olympics.  (didn't have
chance to recheck name).  Possibly a KGB agent discouraging
placing confidence in Western reporters?

this really goes elsewhere
Luther Carter 1980 aug 15 discusses BEPS but fails to mention radon
problem.

Sylvia Hewlett, Columbia, justifies Vietnamese genocide

Sheldon Wolin, professor of politics at Princeton, regards democracy
as illegitimate.  This would justify terrorism.

S.F. Examiner headline writer
early in 1976, the first article on Ford budget was headlined
"Ford budget hits poor"
Oct 21, 1981
"Boudin arrested in daring Brinks caper"
She was arrested after three murders.

David B. Wilson - Boston Globe - anti-nuclear lies Feb 24, 1982

University of California, Berkeley, 1983 March, prevented Jean
Kirkpatrick from speaking.  The mayor of Berkeley, Eugene Newport,
 approved.
(remember next time I speak at Berkeley to tell those who approve
of denying free speech that I would prefer that they leave my
lecture.  Put the exact statement on a piece of paper and read it.


1987 Oct Harvard disruption of speech by Calero, see clippings file

According to the newspapers, a substantial number of people at
this University consider it their right to prevent speakers of
whom they disapprove from addressing their audience.  I wish to
request anyone holding such views to leave, because I don't want
to speak to people who don't let other people speak.

Idea: provoke a repeat of the incident.  Call the police.  If they
don't come, sue the city for violation of civil rights.
See berkel.ns1[w83,jmc], choper.1[let,jmc].

Another idea: A suitable organization holds the meeting off-campus
and announces that disruption will be prosecuted to the fullest
possible extent.  Contempt is expressed for the disrupters.
If they disrupt, the organization calls the police and the mayor,
and if there is disruption, the organization

	1. Sues the mayor and police and individual disrupters for
the price of the tickets that are refunded.  Those attendees who
prefer join the suit adding the cost of gas and time.

	2. File federal and state civil rights charges.

	3. Is there a federal tort being committed?  The object
is to make the suits as analogous as possible to the suits filed
in previous civil rights cases.

It is probably best to do this after the University route has
been tried or if it turns out that the University has the right
to prevent the police from coming.

William Hines of Chicago Sun Times for an arrogant 1984 April 14
column giving NASA his Igor awards for blunders.